Public art is often like Muzak: it exists but you hardly
notice. It’s bland, easy to ignore, and forgettable. Personally, I prefer public art that demands attention
because it is startling, provocative, or even shocking. It also helps if such
art exhibits some beauty even if it is an enigmatic sort.
Gobsmacking public art in the United States is found mostly
in larger coastal and university cities where a good portion on the citizenry
is open minded and not offended by things that are “different.” Medium and smaller cities are less likely to
spend money on, or give their imprimatur to, unusual art that would challenge,
maybe even offend, local citizens who would decry spending THEIR TAX DOLLARS!
on any art that did not include a cross; depict Jesus, a saint, or a hero; or
contain an accurate representation of a pleasant aspect of reality. While, most
public art is bought with private funds, its location in public areas
nonetheless gives each citizen the right to complain.
When I was living in Little Rock in the 1970s, a controversy
arose over a sculpture bought by a quasi-public organization and placed in a very
public location. It was 1978, and the Metrocenter Development District was
trying to revitalize the downtown. It got authorization to create a pedestrian
zone and to place an important piece of art at its center, Main and Capitol
Streets. Following the advice of advising experts, it bought (with funds coming
from a property tax on businesses in the district) a large abstract sculpture
by the renown Henry Moore. It was titled, “Large Standing Figure: Knife Edge.”
The cost was $185,000. For more on the installation of the Henry Moore sculpture in Little Rock see these links: http://www.encyclopediaofarkansas.net/encyclopedia/entry-detail.aspx?search=1&entryID=2131 and https://littlerocklove.wordpress.com/2012/08/10/a-silent-sentinal/
A hullabaloo followed, with a flow of complaints about the sculpture; some people complained that it did not look like anything. “What is it?” they would ask. Also some folks complained about its cost, ridiculing the idiots who made the decision to spend a vast amount of money on such trash, even though general taxpayers did not pitch in a penny. Others suggested the art was, at best, a symbol of the folly of over-educated liberals and, and worst, of the decline and fall of civilization.
When the pedestrian zone was abolished in 1999, the sculpture was moved a couple of blocks to an empty patch in front of a bank. In April of this year, the city of Little Rock acquired it in return for a piece of downtown land. The city will move it to the renovated Arkansas Art Center. The assessed value of the sculpture is about $5 million.
A hullabaloo followed, with a flow of complaints about the sculpture; some people complained that it did not look like anything. “What is it?” they would ask. Also some folks complained about its cost, ridiculing the idiots who made the decision to spend a vast amount of money on such trash, even though general taxpayers did not pitch in a penny. Others suggested the art was, at best, a symbol of the folly of over-educated liberals and, and worst, of the decline and fall of civilization.
When the pedestrian zone was abolished in 1999, the sculpture was moved a couple of blocks to an empty patch in front of a bank. In April of this year, the city of Little Rock acquired it in return for a piece of downtown land. The city will move it to the renovated Arkansas Art Center. The assessed value of the sculpture is about $5 million.
I encountered another example of scorned public art when I
was living in Athens, Georgia. One day I was driving on a rural road south of
Watkinsville, which is a short drive from Athens, when a colleague in the car
yelled at me to look to the left. There in a corn field, about 150 yards from
the road, was a large stylized statue of a horse (named Iron Horse, or Pegasus
without Wings). My colleague then told me the story of how in 1954 the sculpture had been installed on the University of Georgia campus, but many students hated
it. After it had been vandalized a few times, the head of the art school had it
secretly loaded on a truck one night and taken it to the farm of a man who was
happy to host it on his land. The statue, owned by UGA, is still there, but now
the university also owns the land that it uses as an experimental farm.
Fortunately, despite resistance to it, Gobsmacking public
art can be found diverse places throughout the world, including some medium and
smaller cities scattered throughout Europe. I was reminded of that when I
traveled to Vigo, a city of about 300,000 people located on the Atlantic coast
of Spain. I knew also nothing about the city before I arrived there in May, and
chose it mainly because it was a convenient stop after a long train trip through
the mountains from Burgos.
I quickly started enjoying my visit to the city, in large
part due to views of its mountainous residential areas sliding down to the beautiful
waterfront, but also because of its public art. Much of the waterfront is a
working port with cranes and warehouses, but after walking down the hill from
my hotel, I saw the beginning of a long park and walked toward it. As I got
closer, I spotted something that caused me to blurt, “What the ….” It was a
sculpture of a swimmer taking laps in the concrete. It definitely came from the
School of Gobsmacking Art.
"The Swimmer" by Franciso Leiro |
Walking down further the promenade along the waterfront, it
did not take me long to get to another strange site. It was a statue of a man,
Jules Verne, that seemed quite conventional until you noticed that he was
sitting on a huge squid. Unconventional and surprising, I was delighted to see
it. The statue subject is Jules Verne, whose book Twenty Thousand Leagues
Under the Sea, was set in Vigo Bay. If you want to know about the squid,
view this link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xhyuey4xU3Q
Walking a few more minutes on the promenade, I came to a
plaza in front of a waterfront shopping center that is adjacent to the city’s
port, where a gigantic cruise ship was moored. As passengers departed from the
ship and walked onto the plaza, they had a surprise in front of them: a large
sculpture of the head of a woman (or maybe its a man) whose face has smacked the ground. I thought its
name should be “faceplant,” but it turns out to be “Leap.” It was created by
Francisco Leiro, a Galician born in 1945. He is the artist who sculpted the
Swimmer that I saw earlier. The faceplant piece certainly attracted
the attention of the disembarking passengers. After first examining the sculpture myself, I found a nearby place to sit to watch the reactions of people when
they first walked by it.
View of "The Leap" from the back |
I have to say that Vigo’s public art certainly enlivened my strolls
around the city. While I was most attracted to the Gobsmacking public art, I
also enjoyed some of the more conventional art, such as a pair of statues near
the shoreline facing each other. One depicted a fisherman returning from the
sea carrying some fish, the other his family awaiting his return. These sculptures are
touching in a familiar way.
Fisherman's family looks for him |
You are absolutely right about the fact that the public art is appreciated in just larger cities where people like stuff that is different. We are loosing public art so much, I mean how much of the public art is left in the United States? We need to work more on public art to enhance the scenic beauty of our countries.
ReplyDelete